Plaintiff Angela Stevens, on behalf of her minor son D.S., sued various defendants, including the Berryhill Board of Education, Berryhill Public Schools, and individual defendants connected to the school. Stevens brought several claims against the defendants, including a violation of Title IX for gender-based discrimination and bullying, a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act because the school failed to accommodate D.S.’s disabilities, and state-law claims for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress due to the severe bullying and harassment D.S. experienced. She also sought punitive damages and alleged battery, negligent hiring, and supervision by the school authorities. The defendants moved to dismiss.
The Plaintiff’s Factual Allegations
Angela Stevens, the adoptive mother of D.S., sued due to severe bullying faced by D.S. at Berryhill Public Schools. D.S., who developed stunted growth and learning disabilities due to prenatal exposure to methamphetamine, endured consistent bullying, physical assaults, and humiliating acts by fellow students. The plaintiff reported these incidents to school officials, but the school failed to conduct an investigation or respond to stop the bullying. This continuous harassment led to severe psychological effects on D.S., including a suicide attempt and hospitalizations for depression and suicidal ideations.
Arguments and Court’s Rulings
School District’s Liability
The School District argued for the dismissal of various claims, including those under the ADA and Section 504, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages. The Court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, specifically rejecting the School District’s argument over administrative exhaustion for ADA and Section 504 claims.
Title IX, ADA, and Section 504 Claims
The Court found that the gravamen of the complaint concerned the denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE), but since the plaintiff sought relief through compensatory damages (which the IDEA process cannot provide), administrative exhaustion under the IDEA was not required. Thus, the ADA and Section 504 claims against the School District were allowed to proceed.
Punitive Damages
The Court concluded that punitive damages are unavailable under Title IX, Title II, and Section 504, or under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the School District, following precedents set in various Supreme Court cases.
Administrator Claims
The Court granted the motion to dismiss all claims against individual administrators in their official capacities due to redundancy, as the School District itself was a defendant. That said, claims for violating 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and intentional infliction of emotional distress against individual administrators in their personal capacities were allowed to proceed.
Schrag on Law 