Plaintiff Cherry Yolanda Bell sued defendant Employment Connection in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, raising claims of employment discrimination based on race and sex, and retaliation. Defendants move to dismiss.
Factual Overview
Plaintiff Cherry Yolanda Bell alleges she experienced employment discrimination based on her race and sex, as well as retaliation following her complaints about the discrimination. After experiencing what she described as sexual harassment and racial discrimination at her workplace, she filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC issued a Determination and Notice of Rights, informing her of her right to file a lawsuit, which she did on March 2, 2023. Bell’s allegations include being sexually harassed by Bernard Hatley, harassed by Tamera Williams and her supervisor Karla Humphrey, and being terminated shortly after lodging a formal complaint. Bell contends that her complaints about the harassment and discrimination were met with further retaliation, including refusal to pay money owed to her and the fabrication of false complaints against her.
Legal Analysis
Failure to State a Claim The court evaluated the sufficiency of Bell’s complaint under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. The defendant argued that Bell’s complaint was filled with vague and conclusory allegations that failed to establish a plausible claim for relief. The court agreed, stating that while Bell detailed instances of alleged harassment and discrimination, she did not provide sufficient factual evidence to support the elements of her claims of race or gender discrimination under Title VII or to substantiate the unwelcome sexual harassment. The court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, determining that Bell’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Schrag on Law 