Pro Se Dismissal: Ritchhart v. DeJoy et al, No. 23-4078 (10th Cir. Mar. 27, 2024) (J. Moritz)

Plaintiff Deidra Ritchhart sued defendants Louis DeJoy, United States Postmaster General, and Brian L. Renfroe, President of NALC, in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, raising claims of discrimination based on her gender/sex and her disability in violation of Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court dismissed Ritchhart’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim, concluding that Ritchhart had not exhausted her administrative remedies before filing suit. Ritchhart appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Factual Overview

Ritchhart worked for the United States Postal Service (USPS) for approximately one month before her termination on December 22, 2022. She filed a pro se complaint in district court on January 5, 2023, alleging discrimination based upon her gender/sex and her disability under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After being instructed to amend her complaint to correct several deficiencies, including naming the correct defendants under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act and replacing the ADA claim with one under the Rehabilitation Act, Ritchhart filed an amended complaint on January 13, against DeJoy and Renfroe, incorporating her original allegations. The district court dismissed her claims against Renfroe for failure to state a claim and dismissed her claims against DeJoy because Ritchhart admitted she had not yet received a right-to-sue letter, indicating a lack of administrative remedy exhaustion.

Legal Analysis

Dismissal of Claims Against Renfroe: Ritchhart’s claims against Renfroe were dismissed for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Ritchhart’s allegations against Renfroe and the Union failed to show that any action or inaction was due to her gender/sex or her disability, which is required to establish a plausible claim for discrimination under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act.

Dismissal of Claims Against DeJoy: The district court dismissed Ritchhart’s claims against DeJoy under Rule 12(b)(6) for failing to state a claim due to premature filing. The court found that Ritchhart had not exhausted her administrative remedies before filing the lawsuit, as she had not received a right-to-sue letter from the USPS at the time of filing. Ritchhart’s argument that she later received the right-to-sue letter in June 2023 does not negate the fact that her lawsuit was prematurely filed according to the statutes governing Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment, upholding the dismissal of Ritchhart’s amended complaint against both Renfroe and DeJoy for failure to state a claim and for premature filing before exhausting administrative remedies, respectively.