Jennifer Blaine sued Mystere Living & Healthcare, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, raising claims of hostile work environment, retaliation, and sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Before the court is Defendant Mystere Living & Healthcare’s motion for summary judgment.
Statement of Undisputed Facts
Jennifer Blaine worked as a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant at Wellsville Health & Rehabilitation, operated by Mystere Living & Healthcare. She was later promoted to Director of Rehabilitation. Over several years, Blaine experienced and witnessed inappropriate behavior from Tim Sullivan, a coworker who initially worked as a dietary manager and later in the business office. This behavior included inappropriate jokes, staring at women’s chests, and patting his lap suggestively. In Spring 2019, Sullivan touched Blaine’s buttocks during an omelet station event, which she reported to the owner, Scott Averill. In October 2021, Blaine witnessed Sullivan snap a rubber glove at another employee’s bottom. After reporting this incident, Blaine resigned in November 2021, providing two weeks’ notice. Mystere accelerated her departure date but paid her through her intended last day of work.
Legal Analysis
Hostile Work Environment: The court analyzed whether Blaine could establish a hostile work environment claim. It determined that while Blaine subjectively perceived her workplace as hostile, the alleged incidents were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to meet the objective standard required for a hostile work environment claim. The court found that the incidents were too infrequent and not egregious enough to create a hostile work environment as a matter of law.
Retaliation: The court examined Blaine’s retaliation claim, focusing on whether she suffered an adverse employment action. The court concluded that Mystere’s decision to accelerate Blaine’s departure date while still paying her through her intended last day did not constitute an adverse action. The court also rejected Blaine’s constructive discharge theory, finding that the working conditions were not so intolerable that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign.
Sex Discrimination: The court addressed Blaine’s sex discrimination claim, which also relied on a constructive discharge theory. The court found that Blaine failed to establish she suffered an adverse employment action, as she could not meet the higher threshold required for a constructive discharge claim in the context of sex discrimination.
The court granted Mystere Living & Healthcare’s motion for summary judgment on all of Blaine’s claims.
Schrag on Law 