Plaintiff Charles Carpenter sued defendant Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (USPS), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri raising claims of discrimination based on race, age, and disability. Before the court is Defendant DeJoy’s motion for summary judgment.
Statement of Undisputed Facts
Charles Carpenter worked as a mail carrier for the USPS from April 2017 until he was terminated on June 23, 2021. Carpenter sustained a work injury on November 25, 2019, and never returned to work after that date. Despite multiple requests from USPS management, Carpenter failed to provide adequate medical documentation explaining the nature and duration of his injury or inability to work. Carpenter did not request any accommodations for his alleged disability. After several notices and warnings, USPS terminated Carpenter for being absent without leave (AWOL) from August 1, 2020, to December 4, 2020.
Following his termination, Carpenter filed a formal complaint with the USPS Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) office alleging only disability discrimination. He did not raise claims of race or age discrimination in his EEO complaint. The USPS EEO Office issued a Final Agency Decision on April 11, 2022, concluding that the evidence did not support a finding of disability discrimination.
Legal Analysis
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: The court found that Carpenter failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for his race and age discrimination claims. Because Carpenter only raised disability discrimination in his EEO complaint and did not mention race or age, he did not provide proper notice to the USPS of these claims. The court held that race and age discrimination claims are not “like or reasonably related” to disability discrimination claims, and therefore Carpenter’s failure to raise these issues in his EEO complaint barred him from pursuing them in federal court.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Claim: The court dismissed Carpenter’s ADA claim because the USPS, as a federal entity, is not an “employer” under the ADA and therefore cannot be sued under this statute.
Rehabilitation Act Claim: The court analyzed Carpenter’s failure to accommodate claim under the Rehabilitation Act. The court found that Carpenter failed to request a reasonable accommodation or provide USPS with sufficient information about the nature of his disability that would have indicated the need for an accommodation. The court noted that an employer’s duty to provide reasonable accommodations is not triggered until the employee requests an accommodation or provides relevant details of their disability.
The court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant DeJoy on all of Carpenter’s claims, finding that Carpenter failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for his race and age discrimination claims, could not maintain an ADA claim against the USPS, and failed to establish a prima facie case for his Rehabilitation Act failure to accommodate claim.
Schrag on Law 