Ngozi Iweha sued the State of Kansas, Kansas Department of Aging and Disability Services (KDADS), and individual defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, raising claims of hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on all claims, and Iweha appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a thorough 51-page opinion, the Tenth Circuit addressed Iweha’s claims.
Factual Overview
Ngozi Iweha, a Black woman born and educated in Nigeria, worked as a staff pharmacist at Larned State Hospital (LSH) from September 2017 until her termination in August 2020. She was the only Black employee in the pharmacy. During her employment, Iweha experienced various incidents she believed were discriminatory, including coworkers making insensitive comments about Nigeria and her background, being excluded from meetings, and one particularly troubling incident involving a coworker showing her “slave trade beads.” In March 2020, coworkers complained about Iweha’s workplace conduct to human resources, leading to an investigation. Following a confrontational incident on June 10, 2020, Iweha was placed on administrative leave and ultimately terminated effective August 3, 2020.
Legal Analysis
Hostile Work Environment: The court analyzed whether Iweha demonstrated that her workplace was “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult” sufficient to create a hostile work environment. The court found that while the incidents were troubling, they were neither severe nor pervasive enough to meet the high legal standard required for a hostile work environment claim.
Disparate Treatment: Applying the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, the court assumed Iweha established a prima facie case of discrimination but found she failed to show that KDADS’s legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for her termination were pretextual. The court rejected all three of Iweha’s pretext theories, including her arguments about progressive discipline policy violations and the independence of the investigation.
Retaliation: The court addressed three theories of retaliation. First, regarding Iweha’s complaints to her supervisor, the court found she failed to show pretext. Second, the court found Iweha waived her argument about posting the Governor’s letter. Finally, regarding her counsel’s letter, the court found she failed to establish causation between the protected activity and her termination.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on all claims.
Schrag on Law 