Interpleader Action Halted Pending Circuit Review: Tudor v. Galindo, No. 22-cv-00480 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2025) (J. Dishman)

Plaintiff Dr. Rachel Tudor filed a statutory interpleader action in the Western District of Oklahoma under 28 U.S.C. § 1335 against attorneys Marie E. Galindo and others to resolve competing attorney fee claims related to a previous Title VII sex discrimination action. The Court considered whether to stay proceedings pending an interlocutory appeal.

Factual Overview
Dr. Tudor previously filed a Title VII sex discrimination lawsuit. After that case concluded, she filed this interpleader action to resolve competing attorney fee claims. On September 30, 2024, the Court ordered Tudor to deposit $563,823.10 into the Court Clerk’s registry, representing one-third of the remaining settlement amount based on identical contingency fee clauses in all relevant retainer agreements. Defendants Ezra Young and Brittany Stewart appealed to the Tenth Circuit, challenging both the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction and the propriety of ordering the one-third deposit. Several motions remained pending before the district court, including motions to dismiss counterclaims and third-party complaints.

Legal Analysis

Jurisdictional Authority During Appeal: The Court explained that a federal district court and court of appeals should not assert jurisdiction over a case simultaneously. When a notice of appeal is filed, it confers jurisdiction on the appellate court and divests the district court of control over aspects of the case involved in the appeal. The district court retains jurisdiction only over peripheral matters unrelated to the disputed issues on appeal.

Court’s Inherent Authority to Stay Proceedings : The Court noted its inherent power to manage its docket by staying proceedings sua sponte pending an interlocutory appeal. Without addressing the jurisdictional issue raised on appeal, the Court determined that staying the proceedings would achieve the most orderly and expeditious disposition of the case, particularly since the Tenth Circuit’s resolution of the jurisdictional issue could prove controlling over other pending motions.

The Court stayed all proceedings pending the outcome of the interlocutory appeal in Tudor v. Young before the Tenth Circuit.