George Davis, Sr. sued Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in the Western District of Missouri raising claims of disability discrimination, race discrimination, age discrimination, and hostile work environment. The district court granted summary judgment to the VA on all claims, and Davis appealed to the Eighth Circuit.
Factual Overview
Davis worked as a maintenance worker for the VA before becoming disabled. Initially, the VA accommodated him by allowing him to work a desk job while maintaining his previous position and pay grade. When extensions for this arrangement were no longer available under federal regulations, Davis had to find another position. He interviewed for one position but was not selected. When he requested a new position as a reasonable accommodation, the VA placed him in a position that was four pay grades lower than his previous role. Dissatisfied with this outcome, Davis filed suit against the VA.
Legal Analysis
Reasonable Accommodation: The court rejected Davis’s claim that the VA failed to engage in the interactive process in good faith under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court found that the VA made reasonable efforts to accommodate Davis by first moving him to a desk job without reducing his pay and then, when that was no longer possible, finding him another position within the VA, albeit at a lower pay grade. The court emphasized that the ADA does not require employers to select disabled employees over more qualified candidates for open positions, nor does it require employers to maintain an employee’s pay grade when a comparable position is unavailable.
Discrimination Claims: The court dismissed Davis’s race and disability discrimination claims because he failed to establish a prima facie case. Specifically, the person selected for the position Davis wanted was also black and disabled, defeating the requirement that the employer hired someone outside the protected classes. The court dismissed Davis’s age discrimination claim because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not mentioning age discrimination in his administrative charge.
Hostile Work Environment: The court rejected Davis’s hostile work environment claim, finding that requiring him to change jobs with a reduction in pay did not constitute harassment severe or pervasive enough to affect the terms and conditions of his employment.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the VA on all claims.
Schrag on Law 